The Nevada Un-Caucus
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Sunday, January 20th, 2008
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA — The results are in. That’s nice, but we’ve been here looking into why turnout for the Nevada caucuses has been so historically poor, what that means, and why it worked out better this time around. The big-picture question: is our voting system broken?
* UPDATE: Hey There, Wonkette Readers
Previously:
The Iowa Un-Caucus
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
January 21st, 2008 at 12:34 am
Jacob,
Great piece. I couldn’t agree more, it’s like how broken is that? By making it a caucus, less people actually turn out. In a town on a 24 hour clock, why would you make it only possible to vote during one hour of the day? That was a crazy day wasn’t it?
Our video will go up later this week, let’s talk asap. We’ll be in LA to cover the Dem/Rep debates, if we get the credentials.
thanks
Carey
Citizen Kate
Exec Prod
January 21st, 2008 at 12:43 am
Why we should agree to change the voting system on the recommendation of someone who doesn’t know the difference between “less” and “fewer” isn’t clear.