National Journal: What’s So Special About Tuesday?

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

The Gate

Jessica Taylor of the National Journal, the weekly on politics and government, takes a look at our efforts. I had a chance to talk with her yesterday afternoon. Check it out.

4 Responses to “National Journal: What’s So Special About Tuesday?”

  1. AllAboutVoting Says:

    Good article.

    >”This is something we should be talking about,”
    >Soboroff said. “Who’s against voter participation?”

    Playing devil’s advocate for a moment, there arguments against it. You’ve heard some yourself in your interviews. I am not espousing any of these views here - I’m just mentioning some of the arguments.

    * some argue that election integrity is more important than ease of participation. From an integrity point of view, many advocates want a single election day with results counted per-precinct. Vote-by-internet and vote-by-mail and vote-over a longer period of time all have significant election integrity issues.

    * Some argue that having small barriers to participation is a good thing and results in only voters who are informed and have a sufficiently strong view to show up and vote.

    …and then there is he question of whether moving away from our current election-Tuesday system would increase participation:

    * Some argue that the tradition of election Tuesday is worthwhile simply because it is a tradition.

    * Some argue that turnout problems are not at all related to elections being on Tuesday but stem from other sources such as apathy or feelings that people cannot make a real difference. (In my view, WT? has a duty to research this question. Is there strong evidence that reforms like making Tuesday a holiday or weekend voting would significantly improve turnout?)

    * Some argue that making election Tuesday a national holiday or having weekend voting would actually reduce turnout as people would take vacations.

  2. National Journal: What’s So Special About Tuesday? « All About Voting Says:

    [...] 16, 2007 · No Comments The National Journal has posted an article about WhyTuesday?: any election watchers know that national elections are [...]

  3. AllAboutVoting Says:

    An example of a study showing increased voting access leading to reduced turnout:

    Patricia Funk on Swiss elections

    Some posited conclusions by Jeremy Clark of punchscan:

    (1) Internet voting will probably not have the intending effect of increasing turnout
    (2)Turnout can be increased by making the act of voting more visual to other people in society.
    (3) A great way to signal that you voted is a receipt.

    Maybe it is time to advocate for purple thumbs?

  4. Idetrorce Says:

    very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
    Idetrorce

Why Tuesday? is a non-partisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2005 to find solutions to increase voter turnout and participation in elections.

Read More...

MAKE A TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION NOW!

$

Recent Comments

  • Tom Chees: Why can’t we vote by computer? This would eliminate the voting machines,the people to moniter them...
  • bob sagar: We should vote on Sunday just to annoy all the god botherers.
  • Jacob Soboroff: Hey Bob, search “voter participation” when you get to the Google Moderator page and...
  • Bob Richard: I’d vote for your question if I could, but I can’t find it in the list. And I’ve been...
  • Jack McCullough: I support the idea of increasing election participation, but I think most of these efforts are...