Why Tuesday?

Get Involved

G.O.P lateset to put foot down on early primaries

Wednesday, August 29th, 2007

Just days after the Democratic party sounded alarm about the increasingly-earlier primary election schedule, the Republican party followed suit. The Republicans and Democrats have both now threatened not to seat delegates at national conventions of states which plan to hold primary elections ahead of party-imposed start-dates. Click below to see why Marc Santora at the New York Times explains why that might not mean much.

The Democratic National Committee carved out an exception for New Hampshire and South Carolina to vote early, so Democrats in those states have not been penalized.

But the Republican National Committee set up strict new rules in 2000 when it was already clear that states were jockeying to move up their primary dates. The rules were made strict in attempt to avoid the nominating process turning into a national primary, party officials said. Yet despite the rules, some 20 states are likely to all hold primaries on Feb. 5, creating a situation unlike any in modern history.

All the states must submit their nomination proposals to the national party by Sept. 4, so the dates of some primary contests are still not fixed.

“If we don’t do something, this is going to become a national primary, and there will be federal legislation that takes it away from the parties,” said a top national party official who spoke on condition of anonymity because negotiations on the matter were continuing.

There is one possible scenario that could allow the states to seat a full delegation even after they are penalized. If there is a clear nominee by the time of the convention, as has been the case for the last 50 years, the presumptive candidate could petition the national party to restore the delegates from the penalized states. Such a move, however, could anger the states that held back from bumping up their primaries and they could challenge such a move.

While rules may have been put in place to avoid a “national primary,” they may have backfired. States jockeying for attention from presidential candidates are moving their primary elections earlier and earlier at a rapid clip which leaves little choice for candidates but to visit. No biggie for states, but this schedule doesn’t help Americans as a whole much. A longer campaign season means more fund raising — but does it mean a more substantial debate of the issues? Are Americans more likely to tune in or out as the presidential campaign becomes years, not months long? As we’ve reported here before, a national primary — or a variation on the theme — is now being discussed as a solution to the very problem we’re faced with today.

Previously on Why Tuesday?
Primary schedule is “game of political bumper cars”

Comments are closed.

About Us

Why Tuesday? is a non-partisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2005 to find solutions to increase voter turnout and participation in elections... More

The Answer

In 1845, before Florida, California, and Texas were states or slavery had been abolished, Congress needed to pick a time for Americans to vote... More

Recent Comments

Patrick, France is a post-Christian secular country. Relatively few of them attend church, and voting on Sunday does not interfere with their religious practices, because most of the population is not religious...

Posted by John on blog post Why Do We Vote On Tuesday?

In France they last voted on a Sunday. France is despite the Bourbon legacy a largely Catholic country, yet they vote on Sunday...

Posted by Patrick on blog post Why Do We Vote On Tuesday?

I think weekend voting would make the most sense, as people wouldn't have tu run home after work or wake up early to hit the polling stations beforehand.

Posted by Zander on blog post Why Do We Vote On Tuesday?